ThePhalanx.com" /> ThePhalanx.com" />
SAYING WHAT HAS TO BE SAID...IN TRUE LIBERTARIAN FASHION



We told you...

0 comments

How many times do we have to remind people about the true nature of the American left, while under the guise of racial equality and championing the cause of minorities and the oppressed. Every now and then the true colors of these leftists shine through. Now for those with an objective and discerning mind the offensive paternalistic nature of the left has long been apparent, but for others, such as those citizens who blindly follow the likes of the Democratic majority, the truth is only made apparent when staring them directly in the face.

Enter, Harry Reid a failure of a majority leader if ever there was one, someone surely to be defeated by the people of Nevada in this year's congressional elections. Apparently in 2008, in the early days of the presidential campaign, Reid cheered the candidacy of Obama as a "light-skinned" black man who doesn't speak with a "Negro" dialect.

Now off-course the left will rally around this closet bigot because they surely can't afford any distractions in their fascist agenda, but truth be told if it were anyone else he would be derided as a racist and asked to resign.

Lest we forget, we have been down this road before...and we told you so.

Link:

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/10/reid.obama/index.html

Previous Posts:

Democrats show their true colors (or shall we say...contempt for color)

Clinton’s “plantation”

Racial hypocrisy of the left in Maryland


Obama: Its all someone else's fault...but the buck stops here

0 comments

As the fallout over the Christmas Day bomb plot continues, His Royal Highness Barack I (ie, President Obama) announced during yet another press conference this week that in true Truman fashion, the "buck stops here." There's only one difference between Obama and Truman. When Truman made such a statement he actually meant it.

When Obama makes such a declaration, it was peppered with renewed efforst to blame others. Honestly, since this buffoon assumed the presidency a year ago, he has never wasted an opportunity to blame someone else for his many, many, many short comings.

One has to wonder at what point will the American people recognize this man for what he truly is, an unqualified do-nothing, in over his head in more ways than one, and this is reflected by the fact that he frequently seeks out others to blame for his administration's numerous failures.

Enough is indeed enough, if this "president" is to blame for nothing, one must therefore assume that he is responsibile for nothing and thus one must wonder exactly what he thinks he is there for. Americans don't simply elect presidents to kow tow to foreign tyrants, demagogues and potentates. They chose a president to take action, something this man is incapable of doing...

Links:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100109/ap_on_an/us_obama_buck_stops_where_analysis


The System Worked...indeed

0 comments

According to President Obama's Homeland Security Chief, Janet Napolitano, the nation's security protocols worked in thwarting a potential Christmas Day bombing aboard a Northwest Airlines flight bound for Detroit.

This is just such a mind boggling response one would expect from an Asministration of buffoons. Here we have a terrorist on a terror watch-list who boards an international flight with no passport, no baggage and a one way ticket, paid in cash and smuggles an explosive device on the flight, only to be foiled by a Dutch tourist and they claim the system worked?

Has there ever been any nation's chief executive who has been more blameless than the Obama regime? Here we have a president no more qualified to serve as president than a cub scout who never hesitates to shirk responsibility and deflect blame. A president who blames George Bush for all the failings of government, regardless of when they may have taken place.

When the former Economics Minister of Nigeria informs US officials that his son is a terrorist and poses a threat to the United States one would expect officials to take notice. Surely someone on a terror watch list would not be permitted to board a US bound flight without a visa, much less no PASSPORT.

So in light of the recent events of December 25th what have our esteemed rulers leaders done to make international travel safe:
  • no blankets
  • no pillows
  • no use of wifi before landing
  • nothing on your lap before landing
Well I guess we all feel safe now, perhaps they could add to that: thourough screening of those on terror watch list and not allowing passengers onboard without a passport. But wait, didn't you hear. Robert Gibbs all but declared it impossible to watch the 500,000 people currently on the watchlist. That's right, the same government seeking to assume control of the nation's healthcare system.


Merry Christmas America!!!!

0 comments

Merry Christmas America

...now we recognize that not everyone is Christian and many more are Christian in name only but nonetheless we at the Phalanx wish everyone the warmest regards and seasons greetings this holiday season. God bless you all...


13 TRILLION and counting

0 comments

There can be no doubt that over the course of the last three decades this country has been lead by a cadre of buffoons and imbeciles, who's stupidity, selfishness and incompetence reaches epic scales. How else can one describe the current state of affairs in the United States. From the the White House to the halls of Congress a collection and neanderthals our worse enemies could not have imaged. Here we are in the 234th year of the Republic and we are faced with the near certainty of a self inflicted mortal wound and a "Constitution" powerless to prevent it.

In 1970, the US National Debt was $382 billion ($682 billion in 2008 dollars), in 10 years that figure had reached $914 billion (an tripling of the debt to be sure, but still manageable). Last year (2008) the national public debt was over $9 trillion, a ghastly almost insurmountable figure. Yet our political leaders continued to spend as if money was water and of course having no consequence. This year, the latest and perhaps greatest buffoon ever to inhabit the White House has sought to out due his predecessors on an unprecidented scale along with the equally dupliciotous US Congress. Our national debt for 2009 is nearly $13 trillion (90% of GDP). That's right. Since last year the US public debt has increased by FOUR TRILLION DOLLARS. Far surpassing any previous year to year increase by nearly five fold and within the next four years our debt is expected to rise to nearly $20 trillion dollars, greater than our total GDP.

Anyone who has ever studied finance, written a check book or had a job can certainly confirm that when your total debt exceeds your debt by such proportions bankruptcy is inevitable. This of course does not even include efforts by His Majesty, Barack I to assume control over the nation's health care, increase taxation on small business and an assortment of new government programs surely to hasten financial ruin. Perhaps we are all fools as we continue to elect these people, who show no concern for fiscal responsibility, caring only for their own political longevity, while ignoring the immediate consequences.

The most obvious consequence is financial Armageddon. Its only a matter of time before this country is no longer in a position to borrow, with drastic inflation on a scale not unlike Zimbabwe, massive tax increases and shortages. We have already begun to see the signs of such impending disaster. We have several government entitlement programs, particularly Social Security and Medicare with ever increasing fixed costs and no financial reserve and what do our esteemed political leaders choose to do? Fix Social Security? Restore solvency to the Medicare system? No create a new entitlement that could add trillions more to the national debt.

As any financial planner will tell you, debt makes you weak and destroys your independence and our leaders in Washington are doing just that. China, the largest holder of US Treasuries, has made it clear they will not continue to buy government securities indefinitely, and even if they were to do so, our position vis-a-vis China and extremely detrimental. Pray we never enter in to any sort of conflict with the Middle Kingdom as the PRC could easily conquer this nation without firing a single shot. The trillions we have borrowed from the Chinese ensures their ability to strike a death blow to the US economy in an instant and we would be powerless to act.

We needed approach the flagarant violations of teh Constitution which occur regualrlty in Washiungton, the increasing usurpations of federal authority, the diminished role of teh states, the eroding of self government and self determination, the destruction of personal liberity and our increasing subservience to the state. The debt situation alone will cripple us and naturally none of our leaders care and why do you suppose they don't care, because so many ignorant Americans couldn't care less. The same ignorant Americans who crowned Senator Government as His Majesty, Barack I.

And what have we got for all this new spending, surely our economy must be on a fast track recovery rivaling the economic boom times of the 1980s and late 1990s? No not even close. Our unemployment continues to rise and our statist leaders opt to spend hundreds of billions more on misguided "infrastructure" projects as if this is 1930s America and such projects didn't even work then.

His Majesty assured his these stimulus programs will resurrect our economy, but perhaps if the electorate had elected someone who actually had a private sector job or had ever created one then perhaps he would know renovating bathrooms in national parks and distributing condoms to school children does not a job creation program make....Over 70% of all jobs held in America are with small businesses. The very same businesses His Majesty seeks to further tax to fiance his socialist Utopia. Not one single item in the trillions of dollars in spending since the first of the year has been designed to cultivate an atmosphere favorable to job creation. Indeed, the government needn't have spent a single dime to create an atmosphere that would enable small businesses to hire and expand.

We are a nation on a collision course with disaster and collision hastedned by the election of a celebrity obsessed, inarticulate, weak minded, fascist regime, whos only interest lay in furthering their own power. It is unfathomable that with each successive presidential election this country manages to elect someone even more unqualified for the position than the previous...surely we are not that stupid, but the evidence certainly speaks for itself.

Links:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/20/AR2009122002431.html

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/s_658499.html

http://www.usnews.com/blogs/mary-kate-cary/2009/12/17/congress-moving-to-increase-the-national-debt-shows-democrats-are-out-of-touch.html

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34420565/ns/business-personal_finance/


A glimmer of hope

0 comments

After a year of increasing federal encroachment, showing no sign of abating, finally a glimmer of hope.

It's a sorry state of affairs when our only hope rest with the long discredited Republican Party, but sadly that is indeed the case. The citizens of Virginia and New Jersey have clearly expressed their displeasure with Obamaism. Hopefully this trend will continue.


The Scary America...

0 comments

The arrest by Swiss officials of child rapist and film director Roman Polanski has revealed some troubling realities. Apparently there are quite a few people in this world who have no problem or hesitation to countenance child rape.

Polanksi, a convicted child rapist, fled the United States 30 years ago and since that time has he avoided the public spotlight for fear of shame and arrest? No, our friends in Europe apparently have no problem celebrating this filth. Indeed the French foreign ministry has gone so far as to appeal Polanski's case to both the Swiss and US officials. The French foreign minister went so far as to declare that this incident is symbolic of the "scary America" they fear.

The scary America indeed. Since France and other nations never exhibited any desire to bring this fugitive child rapist to justice, they certainly can't claim that too much time has passed and even if such a claim were made it can hardly excuse such a depraved act. Polanski's legal team assert the degenerate was right to flee as the judge in the case was not going to honor a plea bargain, as if such am act excuses his behavior.

The only thing this case truly reveals is a nation and a man devoid of honor. What a disgrace.


If you oppose Obama, you're a racist.

0 comments

Jimmy Carter has never had the reputation for being an effective or efficient leader, not as governor, and certainly not as president. But Carter always seemed to be a man of honor and dignity, or so it would seem. While one could abhor his policies one could respect the individual and his presumed commitment to causes near and dear to his heart. In recent years, especially during the presidency of George W Bush that reputation became tarnished and certain Carter prognostications revealed a far more troubling side to the 39th president.

That revelation has become more apparent this week as Carter has revealed his feelings on the matter of President Obama and a growing chorus of opposition to his policies. Apparently there is only one reason why individuals, such as myself, oppose the president. We are racists. Yes, thats it. It has nothing to do with genuine philosophical differences as we had with Clinton, Gore or Kerry. No in this case its racisim. If you are opposed to cedeing a large proportion of you inidividual liberty to the state then you must be a bigpot. Sure a man such as Carter, couldn't have uttered such drivel, but alas, he most certainly did.

This latest revelation reveals the most inhereent flaw in the mind of the leftists, a flaw apparently shared by the Nobel Laurette as well. The assumption that no one in their right mind could stand in legitimate oppossition to the leftist cause and thus anyone making such claims must be motivated by more sinister influences. But what of thise who are also persons of color? Why we are simply brainwashed as Janeane Garofalo after all, as people like Garofalo pointed out we of color lack the ability to speak or think for ourselves and thus if we oppose the great Obama, we must be suffering from some sort of mind control. Apparently Carter shares this sentiment.


Link:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/09/15/carter.obama/index.html


Socialism in America

0 comments

According to a recent article in the publication Mother Jones, Americans are perfectly fine with socialism in some aspects of life, specifically law enforcement and public safety. This premise, however is inherently flawed as it ignores one basic tenet of government, insofar as the purpose of government was originally intended by the founders of this nation's constitution.

What is the proper function of government. For some the answer to that question is simple: to protect our basic fundamental rights to life, liberty and property. Hence the obvious need for police, firefighters, the military and the courts. For others the proper role for government is more far reaching to include such matters as needs and wants, including food, shelter, clothing, health-care, etc... For those who embrace the former, there is a genuine belief that the two must and will inevitably conflict. Naturally a government seeking to mandate such needs and wants as food, clothing, shelter and health-care must deprive its citizens of their ability to choose for themselves. Such choices can vary. For some it may be the foolish choice to eat poorly or engae in other risky behavior, for some it could be simply forgoing healthcar or making quality health decisions, regardless of which, such choices are ours to make, in as much as our choices do not interfere with the basic rights of others.

Is it a proper function of a government to control its citizens? Any government enaged in an effort to supply needs and wants is thusly eroding the liberty of its people while also depriving citizens their right to property. Considering it is our labor and energies being expended, it is also our livelihoods and lives which are being restricted, thus assaulting each of our basic fundamental and inalienable rights, and for what, so that a government monopoly with a poor track record of managing the affairs and resources of its people can have yet another opportunity at mismanagement fraud and out right theft?

Link:
http://www.motherjones.com/media/2009/09/socialized-america


Much ado about Obama's speech

0 comments

Much ado has been made about Obama's speech. It was touted as a major policy speech designed to re-energize his base of political support and restore momentum to the health care reform movement. The president excoriated his detractors for playing "games" and for meaningless "bickering."

Apparently in this Republic, not agreeing with and applauding on cue the diatribes of your leader is tantamount to bickering or game playing not a legitimate case of citizens seeking a redress of grievances.

At one point during Obama's oratation, he was interrupted by a hot tempered GOP representative from South Carolina who stated (accurately) that the president was lieing. Of course his outburst was ill timed, but then again how else would you expect someone to respond when our very freedom is being stolen by someone skilled in the art of deception. The big lie in Obama's speech was not that coverage would not be provided to illegal aliens. The true lie was Obama's fictional assertion that the $1 trillion spending farce will not add a penny to the deficit. Only the greatest of fools could belive such fantasy. Perhaps the president was miffed by the characterization but then again when did the office of president become such a shrine to an individual. When did the president become a monarch?

What is missing (as usual) from these debates as to what legitimate right does the US government have in dictating and/or imposing such requirements on private citizens. Perhaps for some (primarliy) leftists, the question of federalism and the proper place fopr government was settled years ago, but for others we can still read John Locke and recognize when a social contract has been broken. This US constitution has been violated more times than the average human can count, why bother to hold true to any of its tenets when so many have be cast into the dustbin of history? There is no limited government in America, the very suggestion of a soverign people is comedy in the highest sense.

Link:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/10/AR2009091002090.html?hpid=topnews


About Us



About the Phalanx Editor:



Last posts

Archives

Links


ATOM 0.3











Google